La Novia que se Espanta de Ver la Vida Abierta / 1943
Few if any painters aside from Cezanne, particularly in his
depiction of fruit offered humankind a better empirical comprehension about
the workings of visual perception in its relationship to the effects of time
on matter. If Cezanne's work is about the nature of perception, then
Kahlo's work is about the experience of sensation. No sensation exists
without a perception of it and inversely no perception exists without
producing a sensation as a result of its operation, albeit sometimes as
subtle as a blink. Studying both masters warmly hands over to anyone with
the passion to elucidate the elusive mystery of human consciousness the
auto-generating hermaphroditic Siamese Twin Sensoriperception that gave
birth to experience, then intellect. Kahlo's genius in depicting sensation
is, without question, at its sharpest when she is examining pain.
Kahlo's best-crafted allegorical images are vivid signposts in a barrio of
the world spirit that has a historical as well as mythological basis, the
archetypal land of the tortured or suffering artist. There is no better
cartographer for the area of the collective unconscious that this archetype
inhabits than Frida Kahlo, and no one before or since has done so even
remotely close to as comprehensively. Even though this angle on suffering
before Kahlo was relative terra incognita, depiction of suffering certainly
was not. It was a standard and almost mandatory requisite for an artist to
render an interpretation of the crucifixion for his portfolio; of course,
there are notable exceptions, such as Da Vinci, whose mother many art
historians hypothesize was a Jewish slave. Even into the twentieth
century, many painters continue to depict the crucifixion, even artists as
unlikely to do so as Francis Bacon and Barnett Newman. The mental and
physical agony of crucifixion is as rarefied as it is specific to a
particular experience of pain.The painterly...»»
Quebec Self-Portrait with a Collar of Thorns |